About a month ago, I purchased a broken Keithley 199 multimeter off ebay for about $70 including shipping. From everything I’d read, it was a pretty accurate 5.5 digit, 310,000 count multimeter with a nice bright LED display (as opposed to the Fluke VFD, or HP non-backlit LCD displays). Having bought sight unseen, I wasn’t sure what exactly was broken. It could just be simple user error, or something more serious, but from the age of the unit, it should be fairly repairable.
And thankfully, the manual supplied by Keithley (available here, via KO4BB, without registering), has wonderful block diagrams, layout images, and schematics. After receiving the unit, I found it was indeed non-functional, with wildly varying readings. All the buttons worked, and it would switch ranges, but the readings never worked.
Working with some help via the eevblog forums, the general thought was to confirm the input path using the schematics and a highlighter to mark where the signal was found, etc. Thankfully the Keithley 199 has a diagnostic mode, which allows you to look at the the various inputs to the multiplexer. The meter normally, several times a second, cycles between 0V, 0V, -2.8V, and the signal actually input. It uses these to drive an integrator that looks at the rise/fall time to compare those voltages. Read the “theory of operation” for the Keithley 199 for more info.
Anyway, The signal made it all the way to the integrator, and then disappeared (which I thought was an issue, but wasn’t). I started looking down that path. But when put in the proper diagnostic mode, I could see the integrator working. So that wasn’t it. I had already checked the voltage references in the unit, and they all checked out. Obviously so did the analog ±15V, +5V, and digital 5V rails. What didn’t seem right was the clocking on the analog side of things. So I started looking down that road.
Interestingly, in the start of things, someone on the forums suggested looking at the A/D counts on each side of the opto-couplers. So looking at those, things looked fine coming into the analog side. Coming OUT of the analog side looked bad. So back-tracking, everything went through a hex-inverter (U49 according to the schematics, a 74HCT04). On that, I was getting kind of crap output on the clock signal going further into the analog section, and the A/D counts heading out to the digital side of things were being corrupted as well. So, after ordering a replacement, I unsoldered that IC and tested it on a breadboard, and it worked (after wiring correctly). I installed a 14 pin socket on the board as well, so I could install a new chip when it came. Huh. So I put it back into the board (in the socket), and the meter started working properly. Well crap. I found the issue, but the IC that didn’t work, now seems to work. Talking it over in the forums it seems likely the heat, and mechanical stress of unsoldering probably made a contact a bit better, but it would likely fail again. So, once the new chip arrived, and replaced it, and it still works. =)
So, there are a couple learning experiences here, since this was by far the most complicated repair I’ve done by far. 1. Check your voltage rails. 2. Check your signal path. 3. Check your glue logic. You might be able to swap 2 and 3, depending on what the symptoms are, but I think I probably wasted a bit too much time looking at signal path issues, and should have trusted what I was seeing earlier when I first looked at the glue logic and saw weirdness.
After all that, someone else on the forums found similar failure in that hex inverter. So either there was a batch issue back in the 80’s, or where-ever these meters came from exposed them to something (drop, ECD, etc) that toasted that chip prior to anything else (which is lucky for me). On a big note, thank you test equipment manufacturers for including schematics with your manuals. It’s a bit sad you don’t see it anymore unless you find the service manual.
Simon says
By any chance the eBay auction titled something along “For Parts. Powered but Volts or Ohm Read<"?
Well, I just grabbed the last one of these. Your write up will help me a lot.
Thanks.
staze says
Yup, that was it. Congrats on the last one. I had been thinking about grabbing another, but eh.
I wouldn’t assume it’s the same inverter, but could be. Do you have access to a scope?
Simon says
Thanks. Reading through the eevblog thread I expect to get the one with no power button 🙂
I won it an hour ago – made an offer which I didn’t expect to win. It will take about two weeks to arrive (to europe).
Yes, I have a scope.
I am not through with the thread yet and not sure about the root cause. In the end it was a bad soldering joint involving the U49 (74HCT04) in your case?
staze says
Yeah, it’s a bit of a read. It wasn’t a bad joint, the chip had failed internally. We figured desoldering it may have fixed the problem, but I just replaced it anyway. It’s solid as a rock now… great meter. Just wish I hadn’t tried to calibrate it… since now those ranges are solid based on my other meters, but unknown as far as reality is concerned. =P
Simon says
Glad to hear that it works for you now. Seems like a very nice DMM. I can feel with you about the calibration. Dave really made me a precision/accuracy nuts. Can you trust it?! One day I will get my HP 3457A a NIST traceable calibration. Until then I waste my money on more DMMs and keep them in reference to my Rigols which should still be in the factory calibration timeframe.
Thanks again for your blog about your project – it’s number four on google when searching for Keithley 199. Makes me much more confident that I might be able to repair it. I will keep you posted.
staze says
Yeah, works great. My Fluke 189 is great too, but the Keithley obviously gives me that extra digit, and the LED display is so much easier to read. I do need to find some shop to calibrate it at, but I think the closest one might be Portland. =/
Let me know if you have any questions, or maybe let me know when/if you start a thread on eevblog, and I’ll help out with what I can.
PedroDaGr8 says
It was me that got the one without the power button. The funny thing is, THAT ONE works just fine right out of the box!
staze says
Yup. =) Did you ever get the other one fixed (think you bought 2 didn’t you)?