Everybody Staze...

Nobody leavz...

  • Home
  • About Me
    • LinkedIn
    • Lab
  • Contact
  • Links
  • Reviews
  • Sitemap
  • Weather

Objectivity -> Politics

2004/01/26 By staze

Well, since Chris asked for it, I’ll go ahead and talk about it. Not sure what he covered on it already in his LJ, but I can certainly go over what comes to mind.

First thing, and it’s a major concern with the idea of objectivity. Being Human. The very notion of someone trying to be objective is in some ways, ludicrous. You cannot possibly remove yourself so far from personal feeling to become completely objective. The human experience is based upon personal experience of every human, and when it comes to analysis of a situation, those experiences are used. Let’s say you’re a lawyer or a judge and all you are using to base your decision on is previous law. Well, that’s all due to interpretation too.

Relativity. It’s entirely what is it. The idea of objectivity is really the same as the idea of truth. You have personal truth, and universal truth. Due to the limits of the human experience, you cannot possibly know universal truth, so even if by chance your personal truth was the exact same as universal truth, you would have no way to know. There is no basis for comparison. So, what’s truth? Personal experience, opinion, rational thought, etc etc. All this is what builds someone’s personal truth. So really, objectivity is kind of a myth… though there are exceptions. One, if god exists (something that knows whatever Universal Truth). Another is a computer… but even that is programmed by a person, someone that has experience that tells them that heat is hot, cold is cold, etc etc. To a computer, what does that mean? All this is programming a computer to share experiences that a human has… so while it may be able to be more objective than a human, it’s still only objective from a human point of view. It’s not all bad though… there is a reasonable exception… math. It’s pretty damn objective… but again, only to the human point of view. To another species, or to the universal truth, it could be a long way from objective.

So does this mean objectivity is the same as truth? Seems like it to me. This isn’t to say that people shouldn’t be objective. They should be. But they shouldn’t pass it off as Truth to everyone. Societal objectivity might be able to do this… but only within that society. And until there is a world wide gathering of people into one national society, it seems rather silly to think that the US societal truth is valid to a group of Shiite Muslims on the other side of the world, or even a group of Americans… some would say that you accept the societal truth if you become a citizen of that state… that may be truth to an extent, but you cannot expect people to sign off on a truth that is only written in stone for some people, and is easily changable or avoidable to other people. But then you might argue that those two groups are difference societies… which says there’s even more of a reason to create a world society so there is no group that is able to get around these rules. But you certainly don’t want a subset of people that are non-representative creating this.

This really morphs into something Chris and I have been talking about the past few days. In Japan he has been faced with the reality of being an American in another country, and having to fight with the stereotypes that American’s face in other countries. We’re Cowboys, we don’t care about what the rest of the world thinks, we consume 70% of the worlds GEP, we have a moron for a president (that we didn’t elect), and anytime we don’t like someone, we go to war with them and to hell with what the world thinks. I think that’s basically it. The sad thing is, most of it’s true in one way or another. But, the thing that really doesn’t get across to the world at large: it isn’t all the people that are this way, it’s a subset of the population.

Texans are cowboys, a lot of the midwest are hicks, we all do help consume that much (it’s a group effort), we do have a moron president, but we didn’t vote for him (most of the nation did NOT vote for him), and anytime a subset of the nation doesn’t like someone, they send another subset of the population off to kill them.

One of the main problems, American’s don’t go abroad. They don’t show the world that the average Joe isn’t like his ruling class. It is a ruling class by the way… it’s the top 1% of the country that does all this, and the cowboy thing, well, that’s just movies and Bush (and before him, Daddy and Reagan). A lot of people come to the US from their native country, but a lot of them stay… and others go back, and talk to a small population of their native country and don’t really get across the idea that we’re not all like their pre-existing idea of us. So when someone like Chris goes over to Japan, he gets to face people from Japan, or from other countries saying something about the way Americans are… and Chris having to get into a debate with them about how we really are. Someone saying “Oregon is a hick state” (this came from someone online talking to Tara). And then having to say, “umm, actually Oregon is the most liberal state in the country, and we have the highest Lesbian Percentage of the population in the country” (would that be a percapita thing? lol, kidding, kidding).

So, what do we do, as a nation, to solve this? Well, first thing would be to quit killing people we don’t like. That would be a big chunk there, and really short term too. The other things are going to take time, are going to require something that the US has very little idea of. Long Term Solutions. As a nation, the longest we tend to look into the future is 4 years: the time from one Presidential election to the next. Last time we looked more into the future than that was when Kennedy wanted to go to the moon… but that still wasn’t very far sighted of us. We need to start thinking 10,20,40 years in the future. We need to start educating the people of this country. Raise the national education level of the country up to the point where it should be for the world’s richest country. Get the people to the point where they can truly vote in their best interest, instead of just voting for some pretty commercial add. How about we put however many billions of dollars that Bush is putting toward Mars toward Educating the Nation. But no… that would be taking money that would be going toward Corporate America and spending it within the government. And to get people to vote for you, you have to convince them that Government spending is down. Well, it is, within parts of the Government, but the money does flow. More and More each year… that’s called Growth. I think we need to coin a term for modern republican values…. Retroactive De-evolution Spending. Spend a lot to move the country back to where it was pre-Roosevelt.

Eh, I’ve gotten into Ranting. Comment on this if you want me to cover anything else… I’ve kinda lost the groove.

Until next time.

Filed Under: Archive

Happiness…

2003/12/31 By staze

“I’d be interested to know your views on how to achieve and maintain happiness, whether the world (or people in general) are basically good or evil, and maybe your 10 favorite animes ;]”

Individuals, huh. Oddly enough that might be harder than worldwide, or even “does god exist,” etc. Because really, the religions of the world may or may not care about the existance of a supreme being, but they all attempt to bring happiness or oneness to the individual subscribers of said religion. So really, if I attempt to broach this subject, I will not only be approaching religious ramblings, but I will indeed be stepping on some feet. But hey… that’s why I wear big heavy boots… to step on feet.

I’ll first start out by saying that Happiness is completely subjective. If you don’t believe that, then I’d suggest you stop reading this and go read Ayn Rand or someone equally as annoying… perhaps Ann Coulter.

Okay… with that out of the way. Let’s get down to the tacks. To attain happiness, you must lower your expectations. lol… kidding… partially. Western civilization has poisoned the ability for someone to be happy. Bigger, better, faster. We all know how that goes… we want something, we think it will make us happy, and it usually does give us some happy feeling for a brief amount of time, but it fades and we must go consume again. That’s what we are even without western Civilization… consumers. Food, Water, etc. And ever since the harnessing of fire, some strange desire has appeared in humanity to consume more than (s)he needs. wants. Buddhists and Essenes alike would say we must eliminate the want from life to attain happiness… and there is a very good argument for that. What is a want, a desire? To look for something we do not have: almost always external to our being. A refirmation of the fact that we do not have whatever we are looking for. Be it a cool computer, or happiness itself. “I just wish I could be happy…” Doesn’t that in itself make things worse?

It is the same word game that you play when you say “Try to pick up something infront of you”… all of you that just picked it up fail. I said Try… not Do. Or “Look all you want, you’ll never find anything”. Starting to sound like Yoda? Makes sense… before Lucas f-ed it all up, Yoda was a good representation of some Eastern thought.

Back to what I was saying though… in the West we have some notion that anyone who doesn’t have a ______ (insert item here) must not be happy. “Thou shalt not covet thy…” That could be true… but many a Monk would disgree. They have the clothes on their back… and some might even prefer to have less. Hmmm… but then, they have the choice to give up their worldlies. Someone who lives in Africa with nothing does not have that choice. Hmmm… so is choice integral to happiness? Your guess is as good as mine. But I’d probably say it is. But then we get into what is choice? We all have choice whether we are wealthy or poor… it’s all a matter of magnitude.

So really, it all comes back to the first thing I said… subjective. Happiness comes from within. Be good to yourself, and let life come to you. Don’t force it… Bobby Mcferrin said it too… Don’t Worry, Be Happy. Simple Simple. Don’t dwell in worrying or doubt, or malice. Just live… let things work themselves out… when it comes down to it, it really does come out even in the end.

For now, that’s it.

BTW, have a great and safe New Year’s Eve… don’t do anything I wouldn’t do… er well… you figure that one out. And remember, the reason people have New Year’s Day off is to recover from NYE.

Filed Under: Archive

request to everyone…

2003/12/28 By staze

Yeah yeah, I know I haven’t written the complete review of the movie. I hope to do that tonight or tomorrow if I have the spare time. But I might not have time tomorrow if the eMacs come in. But right now, I have a request to all of you. I have been trying to write my manifesto for years. Covering all the topics I can think of, trying to rationalize my ideas and points of view, etc. Problem is, I get past a brief intro, and a couple of topics, and I lose my interest and it just gets put aside.

This brings me to you. I need people, in the comments, to give me topics to cover. I hope to try to cover one a day, or every couple days. Maybe a few paragraphs, or perhaps a page or two on really big topics.

Not sure if people will do this for me, but I hope so. Ideas for topics would be like, Mad Cow, Abortion, Political Money Contributions, the Death Penalty, etc.

Thanks everyone… I’ll be headed back to Eugene this evening. Hope everyone had a good Holiday (Christmas, Solstice, Festavis, Hanukkah, etc).

Filed Under: Archive

« Previous Page
Next Page »

Weather

Categories / Archives

  • Apple
  • Coding
  • Electronics
  • Energy
  • Home Ownership
  • Miscellany
  • Politics
  • Prius
  • Sys Admin
  • Travel
  • Uncategorized
  • Work
  • June 2026
  • April 2026
  • August 2025
  • April 2025
  • January 2024
  • February 2021
  • July 2020
  • January 2020
  • April 2019
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • June 2017

Copyright © 2026 · Staze On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in